Now we believe what the ancient people knew: material things have “agency” (is this part of the "cultural retrieval of animism" William Irwin Thompson talks about?). Using the potter at his
potter’s wheel as an example, Malafouris (2008) shows that there is no way that human
and material agency can be disentangled. The fingers do not just move the clay;
the clay tells the hands how much pressure to apply. “While agency and
intentionality may not be property of things, they are not properties of humans
either: they are properties of material engagement, that is, of the grey zone
where brain, body, and culture conflate” (2008, 22).
I went to the New Springs Quarry on Thursday with my landscape painting class. I wondered off, found this pipe, followed it.
Material agency is also explored by Kevin Kelly in his
recent book What Technology Wants (2009).
For Kelly, technology creates itself, using humans to do its bidding, always
according to a certain inevitability that is dictated by the circumstances of
the technology that came before, and our normal view of humans creating
technology is a kind of romantic fairy tale that ignores the fact that nearly
every great invention is invented nearly simultaneously by many people at the
same time, all over the world. Darren Lipnicki, a psychologist formerly at the Center for Space Medicine in Berlin, Germany, found a correlation between the bizarreness of his dreams, recorded over eight years, and extremes in local geomagnetic activity.
No comments:
Post a Comment